-
Website
http://www.noodad.com/ -
Original page
http://www.noodad.com/wp/press/appropriate_move_or_overreaction -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
sex_toys
26 comments · 1 points
-
Apex Professionals LLC
13 comments · 1 points
-
Hosting
13 comments · 1 points
-
Domain Names
30 comments · 1 points
-
Isis
7 comments · 8 points
-
-
Popular Threads
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWpBtQcN3lc&sear...
http://www.petitionspot.com/petitions/melaniema...
In Miley's case, not only did Disney ignore her practically-nude Annie Leibovitz photos on the cover and within vanity Fair - a magazine clearly not aimed at teens - but they in fact ramped up on Hanna Montana promotions at Christmastime.
And here's my thing: Disney may not specifically say, "We're a wholesome and positive influence for your kids," but they absolutely do bank on that implied rationale. They ply that perceived image of themselves holding to a higher grade of family-friendly morals and reap millions of dollars in doing so. Yet, they do nothing to set an example when a teenage girl poses for provocative photos on an adult publication. And somehow, the public (for the most part) doesn't take them to task for their failure to adhere to a better moral standard.
We love the Little Einsteins show and I support that brand because I do think it's a quality show that encourages learning and interaction. But at the same time, I grudgingly do so, knowing that I'm feeding dollars into the Disney machine, which promotes - and profits insanely off of - the trampy likes of of Lindsey Lohan & Miley Cyrus.